By Harry Haun
05 Jan 2012
|Photo by Joseph Marzullo/WENN|
Margaret Mitchell of "Gone With the Wind" fame is not the only Margaret from Atlanta to win the Pulitzer Prize for her one and only magnum opus. There is also Margaret Edson, who matched that distinction in 1999 with her play Wit, whetting the public's appetite for more. Mind you, there've been rumblings of a second unproduced play — just as there were rumors that Scarlett O'Hara would ride again during Mitchell's lifetime — but, to date, Edson seems to have settled into a comfortable groove of teaching social studies to sixth-graders.
There's much to be said for saying it all the first time and having nothing else to say on the subject, which is pretty much the case of Wit. The play is based on Edson's painful experiences working in a hospital oncology unit. For a gossamer overlay, she drew on her own love of literature — in particular, her deep-dish analysis of 17th-century poet John Donne, whose "Death Be Not Proud" is invoked at one point. All this is laid at the feet of her heroine, Dr. Vivian Bearing, a hard-driving, demanding, arrogantly academic English prof with stage IV metastatic ovarian cancer. The vulnerability of the invincible comes down, eventually, to a simple line of surrender: "I thought being smart enough would be enough."
|photo by Joan Marcus|
You might assume, since both Nixon and Meadow are breast-cancer survivors, that this had something to do with the selection. "Not really," they shoot back in unison.
Nixon runs with the ball first: "I don't think so. It's just a wonderful play. Yes, it helps not only that we've had cancer but that many people around us have too, survived it or haven't. I think it's so much something that's happening now. But I think that, if it were about some disease she had just made up, it still would be a great play.
"I remember so many moments from it, how amazing Kathleen was. I went very early — it hadn't even opened yet, and I didn't know very much about it — but my mother said, 'I hear there's this play we have to see.' And we were devastated."
Nixon was Meadow's first and only choice for the part. "She's such a great actress and so smart, when I asked her to do it, she said — so thoughtfully — 'That's a really good idea.'"
Nixon's second thought was she might be too young for it. "Then I thought, 'I don't care — to do that part is great.' The character is 50. I'm 45. We split the difference. We made her 48. She should be of a certain age to have achieved real success and stature in her career. Other than that, I don't think her age matters."Continued...