PLAYBILL BRIEF ENCOUNTER With Rebecca Lenkiewicz, the Adaptor of Broadway's New An Enemy of the People

By Robert Simonson
01 Sep 2012

Boyd Gaines and Richard Thomas
Photo by Henry Leutwyler

Since it's an American production, did you tinker with the language further?
RL: Yes. I tinkered with it quite a lot the past few weeks, and then in rehearsal, usual the literal translation. Maybe something I left out before I reinstated. It's been pretty collaborative.

It's a famous play, obviously, and one that has a timeless theme. However, Ibsen has a stern morality that American audiences of today perhaps don't cotton to. How do get past that barrier where the audience feels that they are being preached to?
RL: Well, I don't want it to be just a morality play. If you look just under the surface of it, you'll find it's very much about human frailty, and it's not about being judgmental. It's about how people negotiate the world together. Doctor Thomas Stockmann, around whom the play revolves, and his brother Peter — I think they're very flawed individuals. They're brothers with a primal sibling rivalry and they both have huge flaws.

What is Dr. Stockmann's flaw, in your opinion?
RL: There's ego, there. I think there's selfishness. I think there are things that would make it very hard to live with him as a man, a single-mindedness.

I imagine you've had some conversations with director Doug Hughes.
RL: We've talked a lot. I think he's very brilliant and the atmosphere in the rehearsal room is fantastic, really electric. Everyone is incredibly intelligent and open. It's an open way of working. He strikes me as a director that doesn't have the monomania that some directors do. It's about working together, which is really lovely.

Are you working any other new plays?
RL: I'm working on an original play for Manhattan Theatre Club about Madame Curie. That's in the final rewrites. Hopefully, I'm getting there. And I've got a commission from the National Theatre here.

What is your approach to the Curie story?
RL: It's very much about being a woman in that time, really. And also of overview of her daughter, Eve, who was born in 1903 and died in 2007. She was 104. It covers the span of that as well, or what happened in 104 years with all that science and brilliance. Eve's a character in the play, almost like a narrator. She's very present. It's about the sacrifices people make when they're that driven. And also the turnaround in France. Curie went from heroine to she-devil, because she had an affair with a man after her husband died. It's about how the public can swing, too. She wasn't even Jewish, but her middle name was Salome, and after the Dreyfus Affair, the French just pounced on anyone who was foreign and supposedly dirtying their waters.