|Photo by Aubrey Reuben|
A July 2 statement released by the Society of Stage Directors and Choreographers says that the parties involved in "Carousel Dinner Theatre v. Carrafa, at al." have settled their differences in the case that was pending before the Federal Court in the Northern District of Ohio.
According to a statement, "The Carousel Dinner Theatre, Sean Cercone, Brian Loeffler, Jennifer Cody, Robert Kovach, Dale Dibernardo, and Paul Black (collectively, the 'Akron Production Team') acknowledge that there were similarities in creative, original elements between the Akron production of Urinetown: The Musical and the Broadway production of director John Rando, choreographer John Carrafa, lighting designer Brian MacDevitt, costume designer Gregory Gale, and scenic and environmental designer Scott Pask (the 'Broadway Production Team'). The Akron Production Team also acknowledges creative contributions from the Akron cast."
The Akron Production Team will pay an undisclosed sum to the Broadway Production Team for a license to use elements of the Broadway production that were incorporated into the Akron staging. Both parties, according to the statement, "regret any embarrassment or negative inferences caused by or resulting from this dispute. . . The parties [also] regret any suggestion that anyone associated with either group acted maliciously."
The controversy began Nov. 13, 2006, with a letter from Ronald H. Shechtman, a lawyer for the Broadway team, to two regional productions of Urinetown (the Carousel Dinner Theatre in Akron, OH and the Mercury Theatre in Chicago, IL) accusing both of using "significant aspects of the Broadway Team's original, creative work." The letter said that while the productions had the license to use the Urinetown script and songs, that license did not permit them to use the Broadway direction, choreography and design. The letter accused the productions of violating copyright law and laws against unfair competition, among others, and asked for the productions' accounting figures to "determine an appropriate license fee and damages."
The Chicago lawsuit was settled in November 2007.